The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in American Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 104 (2) , 441-476
- https://doi.org/10.1086/210044
Abstract
Since the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, federal policy has revolutionized employment rights. Equal employment opportunity law, occupational safety and health legislation, and fringe benefits regulation were designed to create employee rights to equal protection, to health and safety, and to the benefits employers promise. In event‐history analyses of data from 279 organizations, this research finds that these legal changes stimulated organizations to create personnel, antidiscrimination, safety, and benefits departments to manage compliance. Yet as institutionalization proceeded, middle managers came to disassociate these new offices from policy and to justify them in purely economic terms, as part of the new human resources management paradigm. This pattern is typical in the United States, where the Constitution symbolizes government rule of industry as illegitimate. It may help to explain the long absence of a theory of the state in organizational analysis and to explain a conundrum noted by state theorists: the federal state is administratively weak but normatively strong.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative politics and the Fifth French RepublicEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1992
- Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American WorkplaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1990
- Rethinking "Weber": The Business Response to Affirmative ActionHarvard Law Review, 1989
- The General Principles of Law, Separation of Powers and Theories of Judicial Decision in FranceInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1986
- Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the U.S. and JapanAmerican Sociological Review, 1985
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983
- CONCEPTS OF RISK AND SAFETY IN TOXIC SUBSTANCES REGULATION: A COMPARISON OF FRANCE AND THE U.S.Policy Studies Journal, 1980
- Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and CeremonyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- A Formal Theory of Differentiation in OrganizationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1970