Multiple Clinic and Home Blood Pressure Measurements Versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Open Access
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- other
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hypertension
- Vol. 34 (2) , 261-266
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.34.2.261
Abstract
—To compare multiple clinic and home blood pressure (BP) measurements and ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of hypertension, we studied 239 middle-aged pharmacologically untreated hypertensive men and women who were referred to the study from the primary healthcare provider. Ambulatory BP monitoring was successfully completed for 233 patients. Clinic BP was measured by a trained nurse with a mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged over 4 duplicate measures. Self-recorded home BP was measured with a semiautomatic oscillometric device twice every morning and twice every evening on 7 consecutive days. Ambulatory BP was recorded with an auscultatory device. Two-dimensionally controlled M-mode echocardiography was successfully performed on 232 patients. Twenty-four–hour urinary albumin was determined by nephelometry. Clinic BP was 144.5±12.6/94.5±7.4 mm Hg, home BP (the mean of 14 self-recorded measures) was 138.9±13.1/92.9±8.6 mm Hg, home morning BP (the mean of the first 4 duplicate morning measures) was 137.1±13.7/92.4±9.2 mm Hg, daytime ambulatory BP was 148.3±13.9/91.9±7.8 mm Hg, nighttime ambulatory BP was 125.5±16.4/75.6±8.9 mm Hg, and 24-hour ambulatory BP was 141.7±14.0/87.2±7.6 mm Hg. Pearson correlation coefficients of clinic, home, home morning, and daytime ambulatory BPs to albuminuria and to the characteristics of the left ventricle were nearly equal. In multivariate regression analyses, 36% ( P <0.0001) of the cross-sectional variation in left ventricular mass index was attributed to gender and home morning systolic BP in models that originally included age, gender, and clinic, self-measured home morning, and ambulatory daytime, nighttime, and 24-hour systolic and diastolic BPs. We concluded that carefully controlled nonphysician-measured clinic and self-measured home BPs, when averaged over 4 duplicate measurements, are as reliable as ambulatory BP monitoring in the clinical evaluation of untreated hypertension.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- How good are standardized blood pressure recordings for diagnosing hypertension? A comparison between office and ambulatory blood pressureJournal Of Hypertension, 1991
- Comparison of Office, Home and 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressures in Borderline and Mild HypertensionAngiology, 1988
- The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home, and clinic pressures.Hypertension, 1988
- 79 Age Related Differences in Blood Pressure Measured by the Family Practitioner, Hospital Clinic and Ambulatory RecordingJournal Of Hypertension, 1987
- Variation in Cuff Blood Pressure in Untreated Outpatients with Mild Hypertension - Implications for Initiating Antihypertensive TreatmentJournal Of Hypertension, 1987
- Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findingsPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- What is the value of home blood pressure measurement in patients with mild hypertension?Hypertension, 1984
- EFFECTS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT BY THE DOCTOR ON PATIENT'S BLOOD PRESSURE AND HEART RATEThe Lancet, 1983
- ERROR IN BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT DUE TO INCORRECT CUFF SIZE IN OBESE PATIENTSThe Lancet, 1982