Differentiating Acute Bacterial Meningitis From Acute Viral Meningitis Among Children With Cerebrospinal Fluid Pleocytosis
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Vol. 23 (6) , 511-517
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000129689.58211.9e
Abstract
Although accurate models for predicting acute bacterial meningitis exist, most have narrow application because of the specific variables selected for them. In this study, we estimate the accuracy of a simple new model with potentially broader applicability. On the basis of previous reports, we created a reduced multivariable logistic regression model for predicting bacterial meningitis that relies on age (years) (AGE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), total protein (TP) and total neutrophil count (TNC) alone. Data were from children ages 1 month-18 years diagnosed with acute enteroviral or bacterial meningitis whose initial CSF revealed >7 white blood cells/mm. A fractional polynomial model was specified and validated internally by the bootstrap procedure. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (discrimination: criterion standard, >0.7), the Hosmer-Lemeshow deciles-of-risk statistic (calibration: criterion standard, P > 0.05) and sensitivity-specificity pairs at prespecified probability thresholds of the model were computed. We identified 60 children with bacterial meningitis and 82 with enteroviral meningitis. At an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97, our model represented by the equation: log odds of bacterial meningitis = 0.343 - 0.003 TNC - 34.802 TP + 21.991 TP - 0.345 AGE, was highly accurate when differentiating between bacterial and enteroviral meningitis. The model fit the data well (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic; P =[r] 0.53). At probability cutoffs between 0.1 and 0.4, the model had sensitivity values between 98 and 92% and specificity values between 62 and 94%. Among children with CSF pleocytosis, a prediction model based exclusively on age, CSF total protein and CSF neutrophils differentiates accurately between acute bacterial and viral meningitis.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The validity of Spanos' and Hoen's models for differential diagnosis of meningitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Multivariate approach to differential diagnosis of acute meningitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1995
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Regression Using Fractional Polynomials of Continuous Covariates: Parsimonious Parametric ModellingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1994
- Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observationsJAMA, 1989
- Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic SystemsScience, 1988
- The Spinal Tap: A New Look at an Old TestAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982
- Community-Acquired Purulent Meningitis: A Review of 1,316 Cases During the Antibiotic Era, 1954-1976Clinical Infectious Diseases, 1980