Flying the smoky skies: secondhand smoke exposure of flight attendants
Open Access
- 25 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 13 (suppl 1) , i8-i19
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.003111
Abstract
Objective:To assess the contribution of secondhand smoke (SHS) to aircraft cabin air pollution and flight attendants’ SHS exposure relative to the general population.Methods:Published air quality measurements, modelling studies, and dosimetry studies were reviewed, analysed, and generalised.Results:Flight attendants reported suffering greatly from SHS pollution on aircraft. Both government and airline sponsored studies concluded that SHS created an air pollution problem in aircraft cabins, while tobacco industry sponsored studies yielding similar data concluded that ventilation controlled SHS, and that SHS pollution levels were low. Between the time that non-smoking sections were established on US carriers in 1973, and the two hour US smoking ban in 1988, commercial aircraft ventilation rates had declined three times as fast as smoking prevalence. The aircraft cabin provided the least volume and lowest ventilation rate per smoker of any social venue, including stand up bars and smoking lounges, and afforded an abnormal respiratory environment. Personal monitors showed little difference in SHS exposures between flight attendants assigned to smoking sections and those assigned to non-smoking sections of aircraft cabins.Conclusions:In-flight air quality measurements in ~250 aircraft, generalised by models, indicate that when smoking was permitted aloft, 95% of the harmful respirable suspended particle (RSP) air pollution in the smoking sections and 85% of that in the non-smoking sections of aircraft cabins was caused by SHS. Typical levels of SHS-RSP on aircraft violated current (PM2.5) federal air quality standards ~threefold for flight attendants, and exceeded SHS irritation thresholds by 10 to 100 times. From cotinine dosimetry, SHS exposure of typical flight attendants in aircraft cabins is estimated to have been >6-fold that of the average US worker and ~14-fold that of the average person. Thus, ventilation systems massively failed to control SHS air pollution in aircraft cabins. These results have implications for studies of the past and future health of flight attendants.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cabin air quality: indoor pollutants and climate during intercontinental flights with and without tobacco smokingIndoor Air, 2002
- A Marked Point Process Model for the Source Proximity Effect in the Indoor EnvironmentJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2002
- Acute sensory responses of nonsmokers at very low environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in controlled laboratory settings.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001
- A Multiple-Smoker Model for Predicting Indoor Air Quality in Public LoungesEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1996
- Exposure of the US Population to Environmental Tobacco SmokeJAMA, 1996
- An Enforceable Indoor Air Quality Standard for Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the Workplace1Risk Analysis, 1993
- Risk Assessment Methodologies for Passive Smoking‐Induced Lung Cancer1Risk Analysis, 1990
- Estimation of Effect of Environmental Tobacco Smoke on Air Quality within Passenger Cabins of Commercial AircraftEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1987
- Indoor Air Pollution, Tobacco Smoke, and Public HealthScience, 1980
- Tobacco and the NonsmokerArchives of environmental health, 1968