Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the antiemetic effect of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo in patients receiving multiple cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy
- 9 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 15 (4) , 417-426
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0158-y
Abstract
To compare the antiemetic efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron plus metopimazine with tropisetron plus placebo during 4 cycles of multiple-day, cisplatin-based chemotherapy. 82 chemotherapy-naive patients with germ cell cancer scheduled to 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (20 or 40 mg/m2/day for 5 days) given every 3 weeks were included. A double-blind parallel trial design was used and patients randomized to tropisetron plus metopimazine or tropisetron plus placebo. Tropisetron was administered as a single 5 mg intravenous dose on days 1–5 and a single 5 mg oral dose on day 6, and metopimazine as 30 mg orally t.i.d. on day 1, and q.i.d on days 2–6. Patients were evaluable for efficacy during a total of 195 cycles. Small, but certain advantages were obtained with the combination. In cycle 1, complete protection from emetic episodes on day 1, days 1–5, days 6–9 and days 1–9 was achieved in 85.7%, 42.9%, 86.2% and 40.5% with tropisetron plus metopimazine and in 90.0%, 22.5%, 64.3% and 17.5% with tropisetron plus placebo, respectively. This difference achieved statistical significance in the overall period, days 1–9 (P = 0.029). During the entire period (days 1–9), significantly less nausea was seen in patients receiving tropisetron plus metopimazine (P = 0.027), whereas other nausea parameters did not reach statistical significance. The cumulative emetic protection rate after 4 cycles was 0.51 with tropisetron plus metopimazine and 0.25 with tropisetron plus placebo (P = 0.037). Side effects were generally few and mild with both treatments and no significant differences were seen. Tropisetron plus metopimazine is superior to tropisetron during 4 cycles of multiple-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but both treatments are ineffective in a number of patients. The effect of the combination seems comparable to that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone. Newer drugs such as the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist, aprepitant, should be investigated to optimize antiemetic therapy in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- New antiemetic drugsAnnals of Oncology, 2006
- Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus ConferenceAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and emesis over multiple cycles of moderately emetogenic chemotherapyCancer, 2005
- Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity—an updateSupportive Care in Cancer, 2004
- Antiemetic therapy for multiple-day chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplant: review and consensus statementSupportive Care in Cancer, 2004
- A double-blind, randomised, crossover comparison of granisetron and ondansetron in 5-day fractionated chemotherapy: Assessment of efficacy, safety and patient preferenceEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- The antiemetic efficacy and safety of granisetron compared with metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving fractionated chemotherapy over 5 daysZeitschrift für Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie, 1993
- Does granisetron remain effective over multiple cycles?European Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- A single-blind study of the efficacy and safety of intravenous granisetron compared with alizapride plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis and control of emesis in patients receiving 5-day cytostatic therapyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- Steroid Antiemesis May Be HarmfulNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981