On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 14 (4) , 435-466
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500011465
Abstract
In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risqué, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component. (Sociology, psychology, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, sociolinguistics)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- On doing “being ordinary”Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1985
- Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”;Paper in Linguistics, 1984
- The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’Journal of Pragmatics, 1981
- Telling My Side: “Limited Access’ as a “Fishing” DeviceSociological Inquiry, 1980