Training and careers in law and psychology: The perspective of students and graduates of dual degree programs
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 8 (3) , 263-283
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370080308
Abstract
Over the last 15 years, commentators have discussed the relative merit—or lack of merit—of J.D.‐Ph.D. training programs in law and psychology. Missing from the discussion, however, are the views of those who have enrolled in and completed dual degree programs. The authors, graduates of a law‐psychology training program, provide both empirical data and their own views concerning the merit of joint degree training in law and psychology. As part of an effort to generate testable hypotheses regarding dual degree programs, the authors conclude that J.D.‐Ph.D. training in law and psychology provides unique insights, skills and opportunities which may be unequalled by other approaches to training in the area.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Law and psychology in Canada: The need for training and research.Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne, 1990
- Law and the fireside inductions (with postscript): Some reflections of a clinical psychologistBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989
- The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events.American Psychologist, 1988
- Social science research in law: A new paradigm.American Psychologist, 1988
- Psychologists as law professors.American Psychologist, 1987
- Bringing psychology to the legal system: Opportunities, obstacles, and efficacy.American Psychologist, 1987
- Announcements.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Law-related courses and programs in graduate psychology departments.American Psychologist, 1982
- Law and the Fireside Inductions: Some Reflections of a Clinical Psychologist1, 2,Journal of Social Issues, 1971
- Some Realism about Realism: Responding to Dean PoundHarvard Law Review, 1931