The choice of instruments for environmental policy: Liability or regulation?
- 19 May 2004
- book chapter
- Published by Emerald Publishing
Abstract
We address in this paper the problem of comparing and choosing among different policy instruments to implement the incentive objective of an efficient deterrence of environmental degradation and the remedy objective of an efficient clean-up of damages and a proper compensation of victims. Two main instruments are considered, namely the assignment of legal liability for environmental damage, such as in the American CERCLA and in the European White Paper, including extended liability provisions, and the design of an incentive regulation framework. Our results derive from a formal and structured analytical approach to modeling the economic interactions between different decision makers such as governments, firms, regulators and financiers.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Harm and Financial ResponsibilityThe Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2000
- Lender Liability for Environmental Harm: An Argument Against Negligence Based RulesEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Lender Penalty for Environmental Damage and the Equilibrium Cost of CapitalEconomica, 1996
- Multidefendant Settlements under Joint and Several Liability: The Problem of InsolvencyThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1994
- The Limitations of Legal Institutions For Addressing Environmental RisksJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- The political economy of environmental regulation: Towards a unifying frameworkPublic Choice, 1990
- Regulation of prices and pollution under incomplete informationJournal of Public Economics, 1985
- On Imperfect Information and Optimal Pollution ControlThe Review of Economic Studies, 1980
- To Tell the Truth: Imperfect Information and Optimal Pollution ControlThe Review of Economic Studies, 1977
- Prices vs. QuantitiesThe Review of Economic Studies, 1974