A Case Against Incorporation of Bowel Segments into the Closed Urinary System
- 1 June 1975
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 113 (6) , 796-802
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59582-8
Abstract
Five patients in whom isolated ileal or ileocecal segments had been incorporated into the urinary tract suffered complications that ended in excision of the bowel segment. A bowel segment functions if it does not meet resistance or increased intraluminal pressures. In a closed system these 2 evils are working constantly against the loop of bowel, subjecting it to growing distension, dilatation and redundancy and, inevitably, residual urine, urinary tract infection, stone formation, electrolyte imbalance and progressive deterioration of the upper urinary tract ensue. What was initially meant to save kidney function causes instead renal damage and eventually total loss of function.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF PARTIAL, SUBTOTAL AND TOTAL CYSTOPLASTY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO URETEROÆCOCYSTOPLASTY, SELECTIVE SPHINCTEROTOMY AND CYSTOCYSTOPLASTY1British Journal of Urology, 1967
- The Ileocolic Segment in Urologic SurgeryJournal of Urology, 1965
- URETERO-ILEOCYSTOPLASTY: A REVIEW OF LATE RESULTS IN FOUR CASESBritish Journal of Urology, 1962
- Replacement of the Ureter by Small Intestine: Clinical Application and Results of the “ileal Ureter”Journal of Urology, 1959
- The migration of sodium, chloride, and potassium ions across the mucous membrane of the ileumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1955
- The Clinical Use of Terminal Ileum as a Substitute UreterJournal of Urology, 1954