Does the Addition of a Duration Improve theLiso‐EpeakRelation for Gamma‐Ray Bursts?
- 20 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 688 (1) , 456-461
- https://doi.org/10.1086/592084
Abstract
Firmani et al. proposed a new Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) luminosity relation that showed a significant improvement over the L_iso-E_peak relation. The new proposed relation simply modifies the E_peak value by multiplying it by a power of T_0.45, where T_0.45 is a particular measure of the GRB duration. We begin by reproducing the results of Firmani for his 19 bursts. We then test the Firmani relation for the same 19 bursts except that we use independently measured values for L_iso, T_0.45, and E_peak, and we find that the relation deteriorates substantially. We further test the relation by using 60 GRBs with measured spectroscopic redshifts, and find a relation that has a comparable scatter as the original L_iso-E_peak relation. That is, a much larger sample of bursts does not reproduce the small scatter as reported by Firmani et al. Finally, we investigate whether the Firmani relation is improved by the use of any of 32 measures of duration in place of T_0.45. The quality of each alternative duration measure is evaluated with the root mean square of the scatter between the observed and fitted logarithmic Liso values. Although we find some durations yield slightly better results than T_0.45, the differences between the duration measures are minimal. We find that the addition of a duration does not add any significant improvement to the L_iso-E_peak relation. We also present a simple and direct derivation of the Firmani relation from both the L_iso-E_peak and Amati relations. In all we conclude that the Firmani relation neither has an independent existence nor does it provide any significant improvement on previously known relations that are simpler.Comment: ApJ in press, 17 pages, 3 figures, 3 tableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing theEp,iLp,isoT0.45correlation on aBeppoSAXandSwiftsample of gamma-ray burstsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2008
- Testing the gamma-ray burst variability/peak luminosity correlation on a Swift homogeneous sampleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2007
- Discovery of a tight correlation among the prompt emission properties of long gamma-ray burstsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006
- The gamma-ray burst variability-peak luminosity correlation: new resultsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2005
- Explaining the Gamma-Ray Burst [ITAL]E[/ITAL][TINF][CLC]peak[/CLC][/TINF] DistributionThe Astrophysical Journal, 2003
- Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma–Ray Bursts with known redshiftsAstronomy & Astrophysics, 2002
- Energetics of Gamma‐Ray BurstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- A Possible Cepheid‐like Luminosity Estimator for the Long Gamma‐Ray BurstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- Systematic Effects on Duration Measurements of Gamma-Ray BurstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1996
- Duration distributions of bright and DIM BATSE gamma-ray burstsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1995