TYPICAL DELAY DETERMINES WAITING TIME ON PERIODIC‐FOOD SCHEDULES: STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTS
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 50 (2) , 197-210
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-197
Abstract
Pigeons and other animals soon learn to wait (pause) after food delivery on periodic-food schedules before resuming the food-rewarded response. Under most conditions the steady-state duration of the average waiting time, t, is a linear function of the typical interfood interval. We describe three experiments designed to explore the limits of this process. In all experiments, t was associated with one key color and the subsequent food delay, T, with another. In the first experiment, we compared the relation between t (waiting time) and T (food delay) under two conditions: when T was held constant, and when T was an inverse function of t. The pigeons could maximize the rate of food delivery under the first condition by setting t to a consistently short value; optimal behavior under the second condition required a linear relation with unit slope between t and T. Despite this difference in optimal policy, the pigeons in both cases showed the same linear relation, with slope less than one, between t and T. This result was confirmed in a second parametric experiment that added a third condition, in which T + t was held constant. Linear waiting appears to be an obligatory rule for pigeons. In a third experiment we arranged for a multiplicative relation between t and T (positive feedback), and produced either very short or very long waiting times as predicted by a quasi-dynamic model in which waiting time is strongly determined by the just-preceding food delay.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accurate DRL performance in the pigeon: Comparison between perching and treadle pressingLearning & Behavior, 1986
- Rational Choice and the Framing of DecisionsThe Journal of Business, 1986
- Scalar Timing in MemoryAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1984
- ECONOMIC CONCEPTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1980
- Stimulus control of behavior during the postreinforcement pause of FI schedulesLearning & Behavior, 1979
- Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.Psychological Review, 1977
- TEMPORAL TRACKING ON CYCLIC‐INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971
- THE RESPONSE‐REINFORCEMENT DEPENDENCY IN FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- A TWO‐STATE ANALYSIS OF FIXED‐INTERVAL RESPONDING IN THE PIGEON1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- Schedules of reinforcement.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957