Passive versus active interferometers: Why cavity losses make them equivalent
- 1 March 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 35 (6) , 2518-2522
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.35.2518
Abstract
Active and passive interferometers (as used, for example, for rotation-rate sensing or gravita- tional-wave detection) are known to have essentially the same ultimate sensitivity, although they appear to work differently, have signals of different sizes, and be limited by different kinds of noise (shot noise for the passive case, spontaneous emission for the active case). This paper explains this remarkable coincidence. The underlying physics common to both systems is brought forth and the role of the losses in limiting the sensitivity is clarified. The possibility of squeezing the field is explicitly considered; it is shown when it can or cannot help, and why.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison between active- and passive-cavity interferometersPhysical Review A, 1986
- Observation of Squeezed States Generated by Four-Wave Mixing in an Optical CavityPhysical Review Letters, 1985
- The ring laser gyroReviews of Modern Physics, 1985
- Noise in homodyne detectionOptics Letters, 1984
- Noise in homodyne and heterodyne detectionOptics Letters, 1983
- Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiersPhysical Review D, 1982
- Closed-loop, low-noise fiber-optic rotation sensorOptics Letters, 1981
- On the dynamic response of nonlinear Fabry-Perot interferometersIEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 1981
- Dissipation in Quantum Mechanics. The Harmonic OscillatorPhysical Review B, 1960
- Irreversibility and Generalized NoisePhysical Review B, 1951