Commentary: Exegesis of effect modification – biological or spurious?
- 3 August 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Vol. 23 (5) , 417-420
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01051.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Z‐scores and the birthweight paradoxPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2009
- Quantification of collider‐stratification bias and the birthweight paradoxPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2009
- Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in Twins and SingletonsTwin Research and Human Genetics, 2007
- Theory of obstetrics: An epidemiologic framework for justifying medically indicated early deliveryBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2007
- Editor's ChoiceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Editor's ChoiceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Invited Commentary: What's So Bad about Curves Crossing Anyway?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- On the importance—and the unimportance— of birthweightInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Some conceptual problems in multivariable analyses of perinatal mortalityPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1991
- Some conceptual problems in multivariable analyses of perinatal mortalityPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 1991