The Role of Personal Characteristics in Perceptions of Dangerousness
- 1 September 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Correctional Psychologist
- Vol. 4 (3) , 241-252
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009385487700400302
Abstract
The literature warns of the problematic nature of predictions of dangerousness. This article discusses two studies investigating the role of personal characteristics-notably race, social class, and criminal history-in evaluations for dangerousness. In the first study, 100 mental health professionals rated altered case history profiles. Analysis of variance revealed that social class and criminal history significantly influenced the raters' evaluations. In the second study, descriptive and discriminant analysis revealed that social power variables distinguished best between 30 forensic hospital patients judged dangerous and 30 others judged nondangerous. Social power variables and a history of violent criminal behavior were found to be of importance in the assessment of dangerousness.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Attribution of "Dangerousness" in Mental Health EvaluationsJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 1974
- Prediction of dangerousness as a function of its perceived consequencesJournal of Criminal Justice, 1974
- The Seriousness of Crimes: Normative Structure and Individual DifferencesAmerican Sociological Review, 1974
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of DangerousnessCrime & Delinquency, 1972
- Prediction of Dangerousness in Mentally Ill CriminalsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972
- The Prediction of Violence with Psychological TestsPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- DANGEROUSNESS-ARREST RATE COMPARISONS OF DISCHARGED PATIENTS AND THE GENERAL POPULATIONAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1965