Significance Levels of Randomization Trend Tests in the Event of Rare Occurrences
- 18 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biometrical Journal
- Vol. 39 (3) , 327-337
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710390307
Abstract
In the statistical evaluation of data from a dose‐response experiment, it is frequently of interest to test for dose‐related trend: an increasing trend in response with increasing dose. The randomization trend test, a generalization of Fisher's exact test, has been recommended for animal tumorigenicity testing when the numbers of tumor occurrences are small. This paper examines the type I error of the randomization trend test, and the Cochran‐Armitage and Mantel‐Haenszel tests. Simulation results show that when the tumor incidence rates are less than 10%, the randomization test is conservative; the test becomes very conservative when the incidence rate is less than 5%. The Cochran‐Armitage and Mantel‐Haenszel tests are slightly anti‐conservative (liberal) when the incidence rates are larger than 3%. Further, we propose a less conservatived method of calculating the p‐value of the randomization trend test by excluding some permutations whose probabilities of occurrence are greater than the probability of the the observed outcome.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Discrete Distribution Used for the Log-rank Test Can Be InaccurateBiometrical Journal, 1993
- A quasi‐exact test for comparing two binomial proportionsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- On alleged gains in power from lowerP‐valuesStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Tumorigenicity Assays, Including Use of the JackknifeBiometrical Journal, 1982
- A Comparison of Alternative Tests for the 2 × 2 Comparative TrialJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1982
- Some Reasons for Not Using the Yates Continuity Correction on 2 × 2 Contingency Tables: CommentJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Chi-Square Tests with One Degree of Freedom; Extensions of the Mantel- Haenszel ProcedureJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963
- Significance Tests in Discrete DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1961
- Tests for Linear Trends in Proportions and FrequenciesPublished by JSTOR ,1955
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954