Function of the dorsal fin in bluegill sunfish: Motor patterns during four distinct locomotor behaviors

Abstract
The median fins of fishes are key features of locomotor morphology which function as complex control surfaces during a variety of behaviors. However, very few studies have experimentally assessed median fin function, as most workers focus on axial structures. In particular, the dorsal fin of many teleost fishes possesses both spiny anterior and soft posterior portions which may function separately during locomotion. We analyzed the function of the soft region of the dorsal fin and of the dorsal inclinator (Di) muscles which are the primary muscles responsible for lateral flexion. We used electromyography to measure in vivo Di activity, as well as activity of the red myomeric muscles located at a similar longitudinal position. We quantified motor patterns during four locomotor behaviors: braking and three propulsive behaviors (steady swimming, kick and glide swimming, and C-starts). During the three propulsive swimming behaviors, the timing of Di activity was more similar to that of ipsilateral red myomeric muscle rather than to contralateral myomeric activity, whereas during braking the timing of activity of the Di muscles was similar to that of the contralateral myomeric musculature. During the three propulsive behaviors, when the Di muscles had activity, it was consistent with the function of stiffening the soft dorsal fin to oppose its tendency to bend as a result of the body being swept laterally through the water. In contrast, activity of the Di muscles during braking was consistent with the function of actively flexing the soft dorsal fin towards the side of the fish that had Di activity. Activity of the Di muscles during steady speed swimming was generally sufficient to resist lateral bending of the soft dorsal fin, whereas during high speed kick and glide swimming and C-starts, Di activity was not sufficient to resist the bending caused by resistive forces imposed by the water. Cumulative data from all four behaviors suggest that the Di muscles can be activated independently relative to the myomeric musculature rather than having a single phase relationship with the myomeric muscle common to all of the observed behaviors.