Choosing Not to Choose in Comparative Policy Research Design: The Case of the Research Network on Gender, Politics, and the State
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Policy Studies Journal
- Vol. 26 (3) , 384-397
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01908.x
Abstract
This research note presents the research design for an in ‐progress comparative study on women's policy offices being conducted by the Research Network on Gender. Politics. and the State. The goal of this article is to examine how this project has been integrating a combined approach into its core research design. It argues that rather than conceptualizing the research design enterprise in terms of a zero‐sum game, where a decision to use either quantitative or qualitative methodology compromises potential research findings, researchers may want to combine the strength of each approach in a single project.This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Importance of Research Design in Political ScienceAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political ScienceAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Translating Quantitative Methods for Qualitative Researchers: The Case of Selection BiasAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Research Design, Falsification, and the Qualitative–Quantitative DivideAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and PolicyAmerican Political Science Review, 1993
- From Sex Roles to Gendered InstitutionsContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1992
- Comparative Public Policy: Field or Method?Comparative Politics, 1978
- Comparative Public Policy: Problems and ProspectsPolicy Studies Journal, 1977
- Comparative Politics and the Comparative MethodAmerican Political Science Review, 1971
- Macrotheories and Microapplications in Comparative Politics: A Widening ChasmComparative Politics, 1968