Explaining Choices among Technological Risks
- 1 February 1988
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 35 (1) , 22-35
- https://doi.org/10.2307/800664
Abstract
I address the issue of the process through which some risks, rather than others, are defined as acceptable. The predominant view, based on psychological research, is summarized and then criticized for taking insufficient account of the structural context within which decisions are made concerning risks. I then use evidence from the history of nuclear power, the unsafe Ford Pintos, and an instance of toxic chemical contamination to develop a more sociological perspective on acceptable risk. The analysis is grounded in organizational theory and centers on decision making processes regarding technological risks.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theory and Method in Social Impact Assessment*Sociological Inquiry, 1987
- Support for environmental protection: The role of moral normsPopulation and Environment, 1985
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy1,2Risk Analysis, 1982
- Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of ChoiceThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1978
- Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Cost benefit analysis and the art of motorcycle maintenancePolicy Sciences, 1977
- Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 1971
- Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- Self-perception: The dependent variable of human performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1967