The Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study pilot trial
Open Access
- 16 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 114 (6) , 770-e20
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01315.x
Abstract
Objective To determine whether ‘less tight’ (versus ‘tight’) control of nonsevere hypertension results in a difference in diastolic blood pressure (dBP) between groups. Design Randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN#57277508). Setting Seventeen obstetric centres in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and UK. Population Inclusion: pregnant women, dBP 90–109 mmHg, pre‐existing/gestational hypertension; live fetus(es); and 20–33+6 weeks. Exclusion: systolic blood pressure ≥ 170 mmHg and proteinuria, contraindication, or major fetal anomaly. Methods Randomisation to less tight (target dBP, 100 mmHg) or tight (target dBP, 85 mmHg) blood pressure control. Main outcome measures Primary: mean dBP at 28, 32 and 36 weeks. Secondary: clinician compliance and women’s satisfaction. Other: serious perinatal and maternal complications. Results A total of 132 women were randomised to less tight (n= 66; seven had no study visit) or tight control (n= 66; one was lost to follow up; seven had no study visit). Mean dBP was significantly lower with tight control: −3.5 mmHg, 95% credible interval (−6.4, −0.6). Clinician compliance was 79% in both groups. Women were satisfied with their care. With less tight (versus tight) control, the rates of other treatments and outcomes were the following: post‐randomisation antenatal antihypertensive medication use: 46 (69.7%) versus 58 (89.2%), severe hypertension: 38 (57.6%) versus 26 (40.0%), proteinuria: 16 (24.2%) versus 20 (30.8%), serious maternal complications: 3 (4.6%) versus 2 (3.1%), preterm birth: 24 (36.4%) versus 26 (40.0%), birthweight: 2675 ± 858 versus 2501 ± 855 g, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission: 15 (22.7%) versus 22 (34.4%), and serious perinatal complications: 9 (13.6%) versus 14 (21.5%). Conclusion The CHIPS pilot trial confirms the feasibility and importance of a large definitive trial to determine the effects of less tight control on serious perinatal and maternal complications.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- An accurate automated blood pressure device for use in pregnancy and pre‐eclampsia: the Microlife 3BTO‐ABJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MITBlood Pressure Monitoring, 2002
- A New and Improved Population-Based Canadian Reference for Birth Weight for Gestational AgePediatrics, 2001
- Antihypertensive drug therapy for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancyPublished by Wiley ,2001
- The detection, investigation and management of hypertension in pregnancy: executive summaryAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Nifedipine versus expectant management in mild to moderate hypertension in pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- Women's Evaluations of Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management for Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes at TermBirth, 1997
- Women's Evaluations of Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management for Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes at TermBirth, 1997
- The prevention of the materal manifestationsofreclampsia by intensive antihypertensive treatmentBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Relationship of cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage and early childhood neurologic handicapsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1983