When in Rome... An Evolutionary Perspective on Conformity
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Vol. 7 (4) , 317-331
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046141
Abstract
Is proportion as important as group size when exploring conformity in small groups? Two tests of Boyd and Richerson’s (1985) conformist transmission model were undertaken. In experiment one, 378 individuals were observed in a computer laboratory. A rare behaviour was modelled by a number of naive models. As each individual entered the laboratory the proportion of models of the behaviour and the behaviour of the newcomer was recorded. In experiment two, 476 participants in psychology experiments took part (unknowingly) in an additional experiment where both proportion and group size were manipulated. Logistic regression indicated that the proportion of models, but not group size, was a significant predictor of conformity in both experiments. The findings are discussed in terms of their contribution to an evolutionary theory of human cooperative behaviour.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost–benefit analysis of social/cultural learning in a nonstationary uncertain environmentEvolution and Human Behavior, 2002
- The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by CommunicationJournal of Communication, 1996
- Gene-culture coevolutionary theoryTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1996
- From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.Psychological Review, 1990
- The psychology of social impact.American Psychologist, 1981
- The effect of stimulus queues on queue-joining behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Increasing the size of the minority: Some gains and some lossesEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1977
- Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969