A controlled study comparing the conventional treatment of idiopathic anorectal abscess with that of incision, curettage and primary suture under systemic antibiotic cover
- 1 January 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 19 (1) , 46-50
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02590851
Abstract
The treatment of anorectal abscess by deroofing and packing on an initial inpatient basis has been compared in a controlled trial with that of incision curettage and primary suture under systemic antibiotic cover in the Accident and Emergency Department. Over a three-year period 219 patients with anorectal abscess were randomly allocated to one or other treatment and subsequently followed up in a rectal clinic. In terms of the time taken for complete healing and the periods lost from work postoperatively, the method of incision, curettage and primary suture under systemic antibiotic cover was found to be significantly superior, without any increased risk of recurrence of the abscess or of subsequent fistula formation.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anorectal suppuration: The results of treatment and the factors influencing the recurrence rateBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973
- Incision with primary suture in the treatment of acute puerperal breast abscessBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- The late results of anorectal abscess treated by incision, curettage, and primary suture under antibiotic coverBritish Journal of Surgery, 1964
- THE USE OF PENICILLIN AND SULPHONAMIDES IN THE TREATMENT OF SUPPURATIONThe Lancet, 1951