A description of radical nephrectomy practice and outcomes in England: 1995–2002
- 17 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 96 (1) , 58-61
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05567.x
Abstract
To describe national trends in the practice of radical nephrectomy (RN) in England between 1995 and 2002. Data were extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics database of the Department of Health in England between 1995/1996 and 2001/2002. Patients were included in the study if an International Classification of Diseases diagnosis code (ICD-10) for malignant neoplasm of the kidney, renal pelvis or ureter, and an operative procedure code (OPCS-4) describing total or partial excision of the kidney by either a laparoscopic or open approach, were present in any of the diagnosis or operative procedure fields. Overall, 17 308 patients were included. Patient age and the proportion who were men did not change over the study period. The proportion of patients admitted as an emergency decreased from 14.0% to 7.5% over this period (P < 0.001). The mean waiting duration increased by almost 6 days (P < 0.001) and length of stay by approximately 1 day, from 11.7 days in 1995 to 10.8 days in 2001 (P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality decreased from 2% to 1.5% (P = 0.134). In-hospital mortality and length of stay were higher in older patients and in those admitted as an emergency. Women had a longer stay than men (11.5 vs 11.1 days), but in-hospital mortality was higher in men (2.3% vs 1.6%). The national number of RNs per year increased by approximately 20%, from 2254 in 1995 to 2671 in 2001. Over the same period the mean annual hospital volume of RN increased by approximately 40%, from 17 in 1995 to 24 in 2001. The annual number of laparoscopic RNs nationally increased from seven in 1995 to 84 in 2002. The annual number of RNs in England increased by almost a fifth and this was accompanied by an increase in annual hospital volume of about two-fifths. There was a large proportional increase in the number of laparoscopic RNs. Emergency admission rates and length of stay decreased but this was not accompanied by a significant change in in-hospital mortality rate.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of Endourology audit of laparoscopic nephrectomyBJU International, 2004
- Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomyUrology, 2004
- Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open vs. laparoscopic approachUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2004
- Complications of Radical and Partial Nephrectomy in a Large Contemporary CohortJournal of Urology, 2004
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Decline in admission rates for acute appendicitis in EnglandBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Hospital Volume, Length of Stay, and Readmission Rates in High-Risk SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Measuring Complications of Cancer Treatment Using the SEER-Medicare DataMedical Care, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Laparoscopic Radical NephrectomyEuropean Urology, 2001