Interpretation of conflicting clinical information by cardiologists
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 62 (4) , 313-315
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)90233-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative diagnostic strategies for coronary artery disease in women: demonstration of the usefulness and efficiency of probability analysis.Circulation, 1985
- Comparison of the multivariate analysis and CADENZA systems for determination of the probability of coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Computer-assisted diagnosis in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- A clinically relevant classification of chest discomfortJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Diagnostic accuracy of cardiologists compared with probability calculations using Bayes' ruleThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1982
- Analysis of Probability as an Aid in the Clinical Diagnosis of Coronary-Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- The Evaluation of Clinical PredictionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Scoring Rules and the Evaluation of Probability AssessorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1969