On the Pleistocene settlement of South America
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 63 (238) , 101-111
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x0007561x
Abstract
Australia and the Americas provide the two case-studies of the late human settlement of a continent by, it seems, Homo sapiens sapiens. At one time the corollaries of first occupation of the Americas, at perhaps 12,000 b.p., were a similarly late settlement of Australia and the need for a land-bridge across the Bering Straits. But now the pattern of occupation in New Guinea and its offshore islands proves that a long sea-crossing was made there before about 40,000 b.p. Here an Australian researcher looks across the Pacific to the evidence that has been offered for a Pleistocene occupation in south America, of a date comparable with that in Sahul.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- How new is the New World?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- Linguistic Evidence in Support of the Coastal Route of Earliest Entry Into the New WorldMan, 1988
- Early cultural evidence from Monte Verde in ChileNature, 1988
- The Palaeoindian debateNature, 1988
- A 40,000 year-old human occupation site at Huon Peninsula, Papua New GuineaNature, 1986
- Carbon-14 dates point to man in the Americas 32,000 years agoNature, 1986
- A Late Ice-Age Settlement in Southern ChileScientific American, 1984
- The Mechanical Manipulation of Randomly Oriented PartsScientific American, 1984