A double-blind comparison of the effectiveness of azathioprine and sulfasalazine in idiopathic proctocolitis
- 1 February 1975
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 20 (2) , 115-120
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01072336
Abstract
A double-blind therapeutic trial of azathioprine in 20 patients with acute proctocolitis was performed over a 3-month period. Azathioprine was compared with sulfasalazine in patients paired and treated in a sequential order. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, biopsy, and radiologic data were assessed by semiquantitative criteria. No significant difference in the effect of the drugs was observed. Both azathioprine and sulfasalazine produce significant improvement in clinical symptoms, some laboratory findings (ESR, serum iron), and endoscopic and biopsy findings (PPP<0.10). This short-term trial confirms previous uncontrolled experiences of one of the authors on larger series of patients.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Azathioprine in Ulcerative Colitis: An Interim Report on a Controlled Therapeutic TrialBMJ, 1972
- Long term therapy of ulcerative colitis with 6-mercaptopurine: A personal seriesDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1972
- Azathioprine treatment of ulcerative colitis, granulomatous colitis and regional enteritisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1971
- Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with AzathioprineBMJ, 1968
- [Data on the therapy of "idiopathic rectocolitis" with immunosuppressive drugs].1966
- Response to azathioprine in ulcerative colitisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1966
- Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis with AntimetabolitesBMJ, 1966
- Early Experiences With Azathioprine in Ulcerative ColitisJAMA, 1966
- THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS WITH 6‐MERCAPTOPURINEThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1962