Candidate Preference and Hostile Humor in the 1968 Elections
- 1 June 1970
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Reports
- Vol. 26 (3) , 779-783
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1970.26.3.779
Abstract
Hostile jokes about Wallace, Nixon, Humphrey, and Senator McCarthy's “disaffected liberal” were rated by college students on the day before the 1968 election. The difference in their response to jokes about Humphrey and Nixon correlated .42 with candidate preference for psychology students ( n = 120), .58 for political science student volunteers ( n = 35). The difference in response to jokes about “disaffected liberals” vs jokes about other groups correlated significantly with attitude toward the Democratic party but not with candidate preference. The results support reference group theory, replicate two other studies of election humor and suggest that the enjoyment of hostile humor depends upon who is being aggressed against.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- When is aggression funny?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969
- Stress, Authoritarianism, and the Enjoyment of Different Kinds of Hostile HumorThe Journal of Psychology, 1968
- Comment on Priest's Article: “Election Jokes: The Effects of Reference Group Membership”Psychological Reports, 1967
- Election Jokes: The Effects of Reference Group MembershipPsychological Reports, 1966