ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF KILLED AND LIVE POLIOMYELITIS VACCINES
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 56 (1) , 21-38
Abstract
Decision-making on the use of poliomyelitis vaccines in the WHO Expanded Immunization Program, particularly in the developing nations, needs to be based on an understanding of the epidemiology of poliomyelitis in different parts of the globe. Killed-virus poliomyelitis vaccines were effective in certain countries that used them exclusively; these were small countries with excellent public health systems, where coverage by the killed vaccine was wide and frequent. Live vaccines, administered to hundreds of millions of persons during the past decade, were also remarkably safe and effective. However, in certain warm-climate countries induction of antibodies in a satisfactorily high proportion of vaccinees was difficult to accomplish. The advantages and disadvantages of each kind of poliomyelitis vaccine need to be weighed with respect to the particular setting in which a vaccine was or will be used.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is poliomyelitis a serious problem in developing countries?--lameness in Ghanaian schools.BMJ, 1977
- Control of Influenza and Poliomyelitis with Killed Virus VaccinesScience, 1977
- IMMUNIZATION IN INDIA WITH TRIVALENT AND MONOVALENT ORAL POLIOVIRUS VACCINES OF ENHANCED POTENCY1976
- Four-year study of WHO virus reports on enteroviruses other than poliovirus.1972
- Poliomyelitis in the world.1970
- STUDIES OF INFANTILE DIARRHEA IN KARACHI, PAKISTAN1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1967
- AN OUTBREAK OF POLIOMYELITIS IN ISRAEL IN 1961 ANDTHE USE OF ATTENUATED TYPE 1 VACCINE IN ITS CONTROL2American Journal of Epidemiology, 1962
- Spread of Poliomyelitis Infection in Nursery SchoolsAmerican Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1955
- SOCIAL SEROLOGY: ANTIBODY LEVELS IN A NORMAL YOUNG POPULATION DURING AN EPIDEMIC OF POLIOMYELITIS12American Journal of Epidemiology, 1951