Does Regional Block Improve Outcome after Surgery?
Open Access
- 1 August 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
- Vol. 19 (3) , 404-411
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x9101900318
Abstract
Seventy-five years have elapsed since the first claim that the use of local anaesthetics improved surgical outcome. Despite extensive research, the literature provides contradictory views of the role of regional block in improving outcome. This paper attempts to reconcile these contradictions by examining biological hypotheses underlying the research question and reviewing relevant epidemiological clinical research methodology. The paper concludes with recommendations to prospective investigators for strategies in design, planning and execution of randomised trials to assess the efficacy of regional block in determining outcome after surgery.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anesthesia Mortality in PerspectiveAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1990
- THE ENDOCRINE RESPONSES TO REGIONAL ANESTHESIAInternational Anesthesiology Clinics, 1988
- Effects of Thoracic Epidural Block and Prenalterol on Coronary Vascular Resistance and Myocardial Metabolism in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1980
- Sympathetic Influences on Coronary Perfusion and Evolving Concepts of Driving Pressure, Resistance, and Transmural Flow RegulationAnesthesiology, 1980
- Stress Free Anaesthesia and SurgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1979
- A New Design for Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Some Thoughts on Clinical Trials, Especially Problems of MultiplicityScience, 1977
- Mechanism of Plasma Catecholamine Increases During Surgical Stress in ManJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1977
- Randomized Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Circulatory Effects of Peridural BlockAnesthesiology, 1970