THEORIES OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REORGANIZATION: AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Public Administration
- Vol. 70 (3) , 429-451
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1992.tb00948.x
Abstract
Local government reorganization has been widespread throughout Europe in the postwar era. Three broad types of theory have set out to explain this phenomenon in a cross‐national context; a welfare state perspective, a functional revolution perspective and a political perspective. The validity of these theories is assessed in the specific context of Belgium. The evidence suggests that none of the prevailing theories can make much headway in explaining the timing and form of reorganization. More promising explanations are to be found through examining broader values, and beliefs and more specific political constellations. The claim or implication that the major local government reorganizations of the postwar era were, in the different countries that experienced it, independent events produced by a common pattern of domestic social, economic or political development has the trappings of scientific theory without its true substance – the ability to explain.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why was the GLC abolished?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1987
- Local Government Reorganization and the Development of the Welfare StateJournal of Public Policy, 1985
- Veranderingen in de gemeentelijke organisatie en beleidsvoeringRes Publica, 1982
- La fusion des communes bruxelloisesRes Publica, 1982
- De samenvoeging van de gemeentenRes Publica, 1977