Some Perspectives on Ethical/Political Issues in Social Science Research
- 1 October 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 2 (4) , 445-453
- https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727600200419
Abstract
Current principles and regulations concerning the ethics of research on human participants draw on two unrelated frames of reference: informed consent and harm/benefit. Problems involved in informed consent include the inability of some classes of potential participants to give such consent, the incompatibility of some research designs with fully informed consent, and ambiguities about the meaning of "informed." Problems involved in the harm/benefit frame include the impossibility of balancing benefit to science and society against harm to an individual and the question of who is to assess harms and benefits. Two currently proposed extensions of commonly accepted principles are discussed: the possible harm of deceptive procedures to the normative order of society, and the rights of categories of individuals, and of institutions, with respect to consent and harm/benefit. The former is favored, the latter oppossed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deposition and Clearance of Inhaled ParticlesEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1976
- Maintaining confidentiality on data in educational research: A systemic analysis.American Psychologist, 1971
- The Experience of Living in CitiesScience, 1970
- Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments.Psychological Bulletin, 1967
- Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "Behavioral Study of Obedience."American Psychologist, 1964