Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.
- 7 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 165 (3) , 277-83
Abstract
Delay to breast cancer diagnosis following an abnormal screening result is associated with anxiety and personal disruption. We assessed the patterns and timeliness of diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening for women with abnormal results who attended organized screening programs in 7 provinces. Using data from the Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Database, we identified 203,141 women aged 50-69 years who underwent screening in 1996 through provincially organized breast cancer screening programs in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. We prospectively followed women with an abnormal screening result through to the completion of the assessment process. We evaluated the waiting times from screening examination to first assessment, from screening examination to first imaging, from screening examination to diagnosis and from first assessment to diagnosis for 13,958 women, stratified according to screening program, mode of detection, whether a biopsy was performed and whether cancer was diagnosed. We observed considerable variations between and within programs in the time to diagnosis. The median time from screening examination to first assessment was 2.6 weeks. The median time from screening examination to diagnosis was 3.7 weeks; this time increased to 6.9 weeks for women undergoing biopsy. Even when no biopsy was performed, 10% of the women waited 9.6 weeks or longer for a diagnosis, as compared with 15.0 weeks or longer for 10% of the women undergoing biopsy. Among the women who had a biopsy, the use of core biopsy was associated with a shorter median time to diagnosis than was open biopsy, and those found to have cancer had shorter waiting times than women with benign biopsy findings. Women undergoing assessment of an abnormal breast cancer screening result waited many weeks for a diagnosis, especially when a biopsy was performed. To ensure that targets for timeliness, adopted nationally in 1999, are realized, improved models of care or dissemination of existing efficient techniques to reach a diagnosis will be needed.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maximum waiting time — a threat to clinical freedom?: Implementation of a policy to reduce waiting times.Health Policy, 2000
- Breast cancer screening in 21 countriesEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 1999
- Stereotactic Core Biopsy Reduces the Reexcision Rate and the Cost of Mammographically Detected CancerJournal of Surgical Research, 1998
- Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammographyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Delay From Symptom to Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer in Washington State and British ColumbiaMedical Care, 1993
- The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1992
- Assessment of the psychological impact of a breast screening programmeThe British Journal of Radiology, 1991
- PENSIVE WOMEN, PAINFUL VIGILS: CONSEQUENCES OF DELAY IN ASSESSMENT OF MAMMOGRAPHIC ABNORMALITIESThe Lancet, 1988