Is there a bias against performing coronary revascularization in women?
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 78 (10) , 1154-1160
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90071-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction. A statewide study. MIDAS Study Group. Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System.Circulation, 1994
- Absence of Sex Bias in the Referral of Patients for Cardiac CatheterizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Coronary surgery and coronary angioplasty in patients with two-vessel coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Selection of Patients for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Revascularization Early after Myocardial Infarction: Is There Evidence for a Gender Bias?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- Sex Differences in the Management of Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Gender, Coronary Artery Disease, and Coronary Bypass SurgeryAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Changing use of coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery in the treatment of chronic coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1990
- Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: A 26-year follow-up of the Framingham populationPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- Primary myocardial revascularizationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1984
- Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: Analyses of risks and long-term resultsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983