Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP)
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 162 (9) , 629-633
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-003-1193-z
Abstract
Informed consent means approval of the legal representative of the child and/or of the competent child for medical interventions following appropriate information. National legal regulations differ in regard to the question when a child has the full right to give his or her autonomous consent. Informed assent means a child's agreement to medical procedures in circumstances where he or she is not legally authorised or lacks sufficient understanding for giving consent competently. Doctors should carefully listen to the opinion and wishes of children who are not able to give full consent and should strive to obtain their assent. Doctors have the responsibility to determine the ability and competence of the child for giving his or her consent or assent. All children, even those not judged as competent, have a right to receive information given in a way that they can understand and give their assent or dissent. This consent/assent process must promote and protect the dignity, privacy and confidentiality of the child and his or her family. Consent or assent is required for all aspects of medical care, for preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic measures and research. Children may effectively refuse treatment or procedures which are not necessary to save their lives or prevent serious harm. Where treatment is necessary to save a life or prevent serious harm, the doctor has the duty to act in the best interest of the child. However, parents may also refuse to consent and in this case national laws and legal mechanisms for resolving disputes may be used.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for informed consent in biomedical research involving paediatric populations as research participantsEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 2003
- Decision making in extreme situations involving children: withholding or withdrawal of life supporting treatment in paediatric care. Statement of the ethics working group of the Confederation of the European Specialists of Paediatrics (CESP)European Journal of Pediatrics, 2001
- The family rule: a framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1999
- Listening to children: have we gone too far (or not far enough)?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1998
- Empirical examination of the ability of children to consent to clinical research.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1998
- Can children withhold consent to treatment?BMJ, 1993
- Children as decision makers: Guidelines for pediatriciansThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1989