Diagnosis in chronic illness: disabling or enabling--the case of chronic fatigue syndrome.
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Vol. 88 (6) , 325-9
Abstract
This paper examines doctors' and patients' views on the consequences of an increasingly common symptomatic diagnosis, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Two studies were conducted: the first comprised interviews with 20 general practitioners; the second was a longitudinal study, comprising three interviews over a period of 2 years with 50 people diagnosed with CFS. Contrasts were apparent between doctors' practical and ethical concerns about articulating a diagnosis of CFS and patients' experiences with and without such a diagnosis. Seventy per cent of the doctors were reluctant to articulate a diagnosis of CFS. They felt constrained by the scientific uncertainty regarding its aetiology and by a concern that diagnosis might become a disabling self-fulfilling prophecy. Patients, by contrast, highlighted the enabling aspects of a singular coherent diagnosis and emphasized the negative effects of having no explanation for their problems.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- History of Chronic Fatigue SyndromeClinical Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Communication and awareness about death: A study of a random sample of dying peopleSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- ON TRUTH TELLING AND THE DIAGNOSIS OF ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE1988
- Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Working Case DefinitionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- Ethics and Cancer: A Survey of the LiteratureSouthern Medical Journal, 1987
- Relativism in the diagnosis of hypoglycemiaSocial Science & Medicine, 1985
- TO TELL OR NOT TO TELL THE DIAGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISThe Lancet, 1985
- DOWN'S SYNDROME: IS DISSATISFACTION WITH DISCLOSURE OF DIAGNOSIS INEVITABLE?Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1984
- Illness behavior and the sick role in chronic diseaseSocial Science & Medicine, 1982