Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Resource and Energy Economics
- Vol. 23 (3) , 191-213
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0928-7655(00)00044-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV StudiesLand Economics, 2000
- Willingness-to-Pay Estimates Using the Double-Bounded Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation Format: A Test for Validity and Precision in a Bayesian FrameworkLand Economics, 1999
- Does a Third Bound Help? Parametric and Nonparametric Welfare Measure from a CV Interval Data StudySSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- Anchoring and Adjustment in Single‐Bounded, Contingent‐Valuation QuestionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997
- Non-users' Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation MethodRegional Studies, 1997
- Modeling Response Incentive Effects in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation DataLand Economics, 1997
- Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studiesEcological Economics, 1995
- Economics in the LaboratoryJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane ResourceAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete ResponsesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984