Reconciling Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus with X‐Ray‐Based Measurements of the Central Skeleton
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 15 (9) , 1850-1855
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.9.1850
Abstract
Osteoporosis is frequently undiagnosed before fracture because of the lack of availability of instruments to quantitate bone mass. To evaluate the utility of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the calcaneus to diagnose osteoporosis, we determined bone mineral density (BMD) of the posterior-arterior spine, total hip, and femoral neck by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and QUS in 312 women aged 50 years and older. A risk factor assessment (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation [SCORE]) also was quantitated in all women. Ninety-four of the 312 women were diagnosed as osteoporotic based on T scores < or = -2.5 at the spine, total hip, and/or femoral neck. The sensitivity of the individual central sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis was 49% at the spine (46 of 94 women), 32% at the total hip (30 of 94 women), and 81% at the femoral neck (76 of 94 women). At a QUS T score < or = -1, the peripheral technique had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 72%. Combining a QUS T score of < or = -1 followed by a risk factor assessment of women with a QUS T score > or = -0.99 using a cut point of 11 increased sensitivity to 81% (comparable with femoral neck DXA) but decreased specificity to 58%. If peripheral QUS measurements and risk factor assessment are the only tools employed before initiation of therapy, the benefits of increased ease of diagnosis will need to be balanced against potentially unnecessary treatment in some normal patients and lack of treatment in some osteoporotic patients.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Combining the Results from Multiple Bone Sites Measured by a New Quantitative Ultrasound Device Improve Discrimination of Hip Fracture?Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- The Challenges of Peripheral Bone Density TestingJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 1998
- Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Women Referred for Bone Density TestingJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 1998
- Precision and Discriminatory Ability of Calcaneal Bone Assessment TechnologiesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current StatusJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Comparisons of Noninvasive Bone Mineral Measurements in Assessing Age-Related Loss, Fracture Discrimination, and Diagnostic ClassificationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Medical Expenditures for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis FoundationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES IIIJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Perspectives: How many women have osteoporosis now?Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995