Bridging the paradigm gap: second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in World Englishes
- Vol. 5 (1) , 3-14
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1986.tb00636.x
Abstract
It is argued that there is a paradigm gap that has prevented research on second‐language acquisition (SLA) theory and indigenized varieties of English (IVEs) from making substantive contributions to each other. While it is true that studies of IVEs and their acquisition have been impressionistic (non‐empirical) and often atheoretical, the lack of rapprochement is also due to SLA theory's excessive reliance for its models on acquisition in native‐speaker environments and ignorance of the dynamics of language use in multilingual settings. This has resulted in the neglect and misunderstanding of IVEs. It is shown that IVEs represent a number of significant sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic variables, the investigation of which will put SLA theory on firmer theoretical ground and give it greater explanatory power.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sociolinguistic context and second‐language acquisition: acculturation and creativity in Malaysian EnglishWorld Englishes, 1986
- Second Language AcquisitionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- English for Cross-Cultural CommunicationPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- Asian Student Attitudes towards EnglishPublished by Springer Nature ,1981
- The syntax and psycholinguistics of bilingual code mixing.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1980
- Models of English for The Third World: White Man's Linguistic Burden or Language Pragmatics?TESOL Quarterly, 1976
- Is Second Language Learning like the FirstTESOL Quarterly, 1974
- MOTIVATION TO LEARN AND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCYLanguage Learning, 1972
- APPROXIMATIVE SYSTEMS OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNERSInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1971
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORSInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1967