Stented Versus Nonstented Ureteroileal Anastomoses: Is there a Difference With Regard to Leak and Stricture?
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 134 (6) , 1101-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)47644-0
Abstract
We reviewed the clinical histories of 362 patients (711 renal units) who had undergone ileal conduit diversion. Stents were used in 126 patients (247 renal units) and were not used in 236 (464 renal units). The stented group was divided further into 95 patients (186 renal units) with silicone single J stents and 31 (61 renal units) with some other type of stent. The over-all incidence of urine leakage was 1.7 percent (6 of 362 patients). The over-all incidence of stricture was 3.9 percent (11 without and 3 with stents). No leak occurred among the 126 patients in whom a stent was used. None of the 95 patients in whom silicone single J stents were used had stricture. If stents are to be used, we recommend silicone single J stents because of their satisfactory performance to date.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of single J urinary diversion stents in intestinal urinary diversionUrology, 1983
- Management of Urinary and Bowel Complications after Ileal Conduit DiversionJournal of Urology, 1982
- Double-J and Diversion StentsUrologic Clinics of North America, 1982
- Complications of Ureteroileal Conduit with Radical Cystectomy: Review of 336 CasesJournal of Urology, 1980
- Complications of Radical Cystectomy for Carcinoma of the BladderJournal of Urology, 1980
- Four Methods of Uretero-Intestinal Anastomosis in Urinary Conduit DiversionScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1979
- Early and Late Complications of Ileal Condiut Urinary DiversionScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1978
- Radical Cystectomy for Carcinoma of the Bladder: 16 Years of ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1975
- Urinary fistulas after ureteral diversionThe American Journal of Surgery, 1972
- Bladder Substitution After Pelvic EviscerationSurgical Clinics of North America, 1950