To what degree does the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) correctly identify DSM‐IV disorders? Testing validity issues in a clinical sample
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 7 (3) , 142-155
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.44
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structure, Content and Reliability of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) Substance Use SectionsEuropean Addiction Research, 1998
- Methodological studies of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in the US national comorbidity survey (NCS)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 1998
- Lifetime Prevalence, Demographic Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Validity of Nonaffective Psychosis as Assessed in a US Community SampleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1996
- DSM-IV and the disappearance of agoraphobia without a history of panic disorder: new data on a controversial diagnosisAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1995
- A Comparison of Two Structured Diagnostic Interviews: CIDI and SCANAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1995
- Diagnosing major depression in the elderly: Evidence for response bias in standardized diagnostic interviews?Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1994
- Lifetime and 12-Month Prevalence of DSM-III-R Psychiatric Disorders in the United StatesArchives of General Psychiatry, 1994
- An assessment of structured diagnostic interviews for adult anxiety disordersInternational Review of Psychiatry, 1991
- CIDI, SCAN and IPDE: structured diagnostic interviews for ICD 10 and DSM III-REuropean Psychiatry, 1991
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960