Variations in Risk-Adjusted Cesarean Delivery Rates According to Race and Health Insurance
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 38 (1) , 35-44
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200001000-00005
Abstract
To assess the association between race and insurance and Cesarean delivery rates after adjusting for clinical risk factors that increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery. Retrospective cohort study in 21 hospitals in northeast Ohio. 25,697 women without prior cesarean deliveries admitted for labor and delivery January 1993 through June 1995. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from patients' medical records. The risk of cesarean delivery was adjusted for 39 maternal and neonatal risk factors that were included in a previously developed risk-adjustment model using nested logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios for cesarean delivery in nonwhite patients relative to whites and for patients with government insurance or who were uninsured relative to patients with commercial insurance. The overall rate of cesarean delivery was similar in white and nonwhite patients (15.8% and 16.1%, respectively), but rates varied (P < 0.001) according to insurance (17.0%, 14.2%, 10.7% in patients with commercial insurance, government insurance, and without insurance, respectively). However, after adjusting for clinical factors, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of cesarean delivery was higher in nonwhite patients (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.57; P < 0.001), but similar for patients with government insurance (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.90-1.14; P = 0.84) and lower for uninsured patients (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41, 1.03; P = 0.067), albeit not statistically significant. In analyses stratified according to quintiles of predicted risk of cesarean delivery, racial differences were largely limited to patients in the lower risk quintiles. However, differences in odds ratios for uninsured patients were seen across the risk quintiles, although odds ratios were not statistically significant. After adjusting for clinical factors, race and insurance status may independently influence the use of cesarean delivery. The higher rates in nonwhites and lower rates in the uninsured may reflect differences in patient preferences or expectations, differences in physician practice, or unmeasured risk factors. The lower odds of cesarean delivery in uninsured women, particularly women at high risk, may raise the issue of underutilization of services and warrants further study.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF CESAREAN SECTION RATE ON HEALTH OUTCOMEInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1999
- Severity-adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Results of a regional studyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Physician discretion and racial variation in the use of surgical proceduresArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Further evidence concerning the use of a clinical comorbidity index with ICD-9-CM administrative dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Presentation adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectivesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean sectionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Socioeconomic Differences in Rates of Cesarean SectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The Physician Factor in Cesarean Birth RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Relation of Private or Clinic Care to the Cesarean Birth RateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Surveillance of Malformations at Birth: a comparison of two record systems run in parallelInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1977