Strange Bedfellows: Is Sex Offender Notification a Form of Community Justice?
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 45 (3) , 299-315
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128799045003001
Abstract
Nationwide legislation requires that the names of convicted sex offenders living in communities be made public. The social movement that drives sex offender notification uses the rhetoric of community justice. The authors consider whether notification is truly a community justice initiative. The logic of notification is compared with that of restorative community justice. Implicit and explicit understandings of community, victims, offenders, and social control are examined. The article concludes that the principles of notification are largely inconsistent with those of community justice. The success of the notification movement highlights the urgent need for effective interventions that address sexual violence.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconsidering Restorative Justice: The Corruption of Benevolence Revisited?Crime & Delinquency, 1999
- The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault casesJustice Quarterly, 1997
- Motivation or ConfrontationCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1997
- The Power of Community Mediation: Government and Formation of Self-IdentityLaw & Society Review, 1996
- Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy, and Republican Criminology: Washington State's Community Protection ActLaw & Society Review, 1994
- Law enforcement and the citizen: Non‐governmental participants in crime prevention and controlPolicing and Society, 1992
- Problem-Solving and Community PolicingCrime and Justice, 1992
- Victim-Offender Mediation: A Survey of Program Characteristics and Perceptions of EffectivenessCrime & Delinquency, 1989
- Universal Applicability of Probation Risk‐Assessment InstrumentsCriminology, 1984
- The Victim/Offender Reconciliation Program: A Message to Correctional ReformersUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 1983