A graphical method for assessing risk factor threshold values using the generalized additive model: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis
- 16 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
- Vol. 12 (1) , 62-79
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-012-0082-1
Abstract
Continuous variable dichotomization is a popular technique used in the estimation of the effect of risk factors on health outcomes in multivariate regression settings. Researchers follow this practice in order to simplify data analysis, which it unquestionably does. However thresholds used to dichotomize those variables are usually ad-hoc, based on expert opinions, or mean, median or quantile splits and can add bias to the effect of the risk factors on specific outcomes and underestimate such effect. In this paper, we suggest the use of a semi-parametric method and visualization for improvement of the threshold selection in variable dichotomization while accounting for mixture distributions in the outcome of interest and adjusting for covariates. For clinicians, these empirically based thresholds of risk factors, if they exist, could be informative in terms of the highest or lowest point of a risk factor beyond which no additional impact on the outcome should be expected.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relation of familial patterns of coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes to subclinical atherosclerosis: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosisGenetics in Medicine, 2008
- SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivationNature Genetics, 2008
- General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary CareCirculation, 2008
- Change‐point ProblemPublished by Wiley ,2005
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)JAMA, 2001
- Issues in Measuring ReliabilityWritten Communication, 1999
- Treatment of continuous data as categoric variables in obstetrics and gynecologyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic FactorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- Better Bootstrap Confidence IntervalsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983