All Hazardous Waste Politics is Local: Grass‐roots Advocacy and Public Participation in siting and Cleanup Decisions
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Policy Studies Journal
- Vol. 26 (4) , 748-759
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01944.x
Abstract
The combined effects of federalism and interest group pluralism pose particularly difficult problems for hazardous waste siting and cleanup decisions. Most national environmental groups have only limited involvement in local hazardous waste politics, while local grass‐roots advocates have very different interests and sometimes are pitted against one another. Both the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy recently have begun to use site‐specific citizen advisory boards at cleanup sites. This approach appears to improve communications at some sites, but does not address the issues of “not in my back yard” politics and alleged inequitable exposure to hazardous wastes.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Private Production of Public Goods: Organizational Maintenance, Managers' Objectives, and Collective GoalsAmerican Political Science Review, 1997
- Locating Southern LULUs: Race, Class, and Environmental JusticeState and Local Government Review, 1997
- The Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring Environmental JusticeRisk Analysis, 1996
- Testing for Environmental Racism: Prejudice, Profits, Political Power?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1995
- Social Equity and Environmental Risk1Risk Analysis, 1993