RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHOTORECEPTOR OUTER SEGMENT LENGTH AND VISUAL ACUITY IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Retina
- Vol. 30 (1) , 63-70
- https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181bd2c5a
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to quantify photoreceptor outer segment (PROS) length in 27 consecutive patients (30 eyes) with diabetic macular edema using spectral domain optical coherence tomography and to describe the correlation between PROS length and visual acuity. Methods: Three spectral domain–optical coherence tomography scans were performed on all eyes during each session using Cirrus HD-OCT. A prototype algorithm was developed for quantitative assessment of PROS length. Retinal thicknesses and PROS lengths were calculated for 3 parameters: macular grid (6 × 6 mm), central subfield (1 mm), and center foveal point (0.33 mm). Intrasession repeatability was assessed using coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient. The association between retinal thickness and PROS length with visual acuity was assessed using linear regression and Pearson correlation analyses. The main outcome measures include intrasession repeatability of macular parameters and correlation of these parameters with visual acuity. Results: Mean retinal thickness and PROS length were 298 μm to 381 μm and 30 μm to 32 μm, respectively, for macular parameters assessed in this study. Coefficient of variation values were 0.75% to 4.13% for retinal thickness and 1.97% to 14.01% for PROS length. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were 0.96 to 0.99 and 0.73 to 0.98 for retinal thickness and PROS length, respectively. Slopes from linear regression analyses assessing the association of retinal thickness and visual acuity were not significantly different from 0 (P > 0.20), whereas the slopes of PROS length and visual acuity were significantly different from 0 (P < 0.0005). Correlation coefficients for macular thickness and visual acuity ranged from 0.13 to 0.22, whereas coefficients for PROS length and visual acuity ranged from −0.61 to −0.81. Conclusion: Photoreceptor outer segment length can be quantitatively assessed using Cirrus HD-OCT. Although the intrasession repeatability of PROS measurements was less than that of macular thickness measurements, the stronger correlation of PROS length with visual acuity suggests that the PROS measures may be more directly related to visual function. Photoreceptor outer segment length may be a useful physiologic outcome measure, both clinically and as a direct assessment of treatment effects.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrahigh-Speed Optical Coherence Tomography for Three-Dimensional and En Face Imaging of the Retina and Optic Nerve HeadInvestigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2008
- Evaluation of Time Domain and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in the Measurement of Diabetic Macular EdemaInvestigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2008
- Photoreceptor integrity and visual acuity in cystoid macular oedema associated with retinitis pigmentosaEye, 2008
- Characterization of Outer Retinal Morphology with High-Speed, Ultrahigh-Resolution Optical Coherence TomographyInvestigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2008
- Photoreceptor Inner and Outer Segment Defects in Myopic FoveoschisisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2008
- Photodynamic Therapy for Angioid StreaksOphthalmology, 2007
- Reproducibility of Macular Thickness and Volume Using Zeiss Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Diabetic Macular EdemaOphthalmology, 2007
- Relationship between Optical Coherence Tomography–Measured Central Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular EdemaOphthalmology, 2006
- Ultra-high Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Photoreceptors in Retinitis Pigmentosa and Related DiseasesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2006
- Regression of Serous Macular Detachment After Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in Patients With Diabetic Macular EdemaAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2005