Results of Clinical Assessment after Primary Digital Nerve Repair
- 1 April 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
- Vol. 19 (2) , 255-257
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(94)90180-5
Abstract
We have carried out a retrospective study of 88 consecutive digital nerve repairs in 84 patients who presented to this department between September 1989 and September 1991. 94% of the patients were operated on within 24 hours of the injury, and the nerves were repaired using magnifying loupes (× 4.5) 71 patients were assessed clinically 8 to 32 months post-operatively. 17% of the patients had excellent results, 51.1% good results, 22.8% fair results and 9.1% had poor results. Close correlation between age and recovery of sensation and between smoking and nerve recovery were found. Results were better in nerves that were cut cleanly (64.3% were excellent/good) than in crushed nerves (28.1%). Without the availability of an operating microscope, loupes give a satisfactory result in nerve repair, and this study compares well with reported series.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Long Term Result of Digital Nerve Repair in No-Man’s LandJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1992
- Results of Primary Repair of Digital NervesJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1991
- Advances in peripheral nerve repair in emergency surgery of the handWorld Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Results of Digital Neurorrhaphy in AdultsJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1985
- Sensory re-education after median nerve lesionsThe Hand, 1976
- Factors Influencing the Success of the Surgical Repair of Peripheral NervesSurgical Clinics of North America, 1972
- A Follow-up Study of 172 Peripheral Nerve Injuries in the Upper Extremity in CiviliansJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1962