Predicting Marijuana Use Among Adolescents
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of the Addictions
- Vol. 25 (5) , 531-544
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089009053174
Abstract
The present paper (1) contrasts the prevalence of marijuana use and involvement with marijuana among 194 delinquent and 405 nondelinquent adolescents, (2) examines the utility of an expanded version of Jessor and Jessor''s (1977) problem behavior model in predicting adolescent marijuana use, and (3) tests the relative importance of the predictors of marijuana use. Personality variables that were added to the Jessor problem behavior model included: (1) stimulus reducing - augmenting, (2) ego strength, (3) anxiety, and (4) field dependence. Results showed that delinquents reported using marijuana more often than nondelinquents. In the multiple regression analyses the expanded model explained a slightly greater percentage of the variance in adolescent marijuana use than the Jessor and Jessor mdel. Of the added personality variables, the Vando (1969) Reducer-Augmenter dimension seemed to be a particularly significant predictor. In addition, reducing-augmenting seemed to be a better predictor of involvement with marijuana than several previously used personality and demographic variables since it replaced these in the final regression equation. Perceived environment variables measuring pressure from friends to use marijuana and friends as models for marijuana use were the best predictors of marijuana use.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- An 8-year study of multiple influences on drug use and drug use consequences.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Psychosocial Correlates of Marijuana Use and Problem Drinking in a National Sample of AdolescentsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 1980
- The alcoholic personality. A reanalysis of the literature.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1979
- Adolescent problem drinking. Psychosocial correlates in a national sample study.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1978