Documenting the rationale and psychometric characteristics of patient reported outcomes for labeling and promotional claims: the PRO Evidence Dossier
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 16 (4) , 717-723
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9153-5
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) are willing to consider including information on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in product labeling and advertising. Pharmaceutical industry researchers must provide sufficient evidence supporting PRO benefit before an approval may be granted. This report describes the purpose and content of a PRO Evidence Dossier, which consists of important information supporting PRO claims. The dossier should be completed by pharmaceutical industry or other researchers to document the planning of the PRO assessment strategy, psychometric evidence, desired target labeling statements, and the clinical trial evidence of PRO benefits. The systematic reporting and documentation of information on the rationale for including PROs, rationale for the selection of specific PRO instruments, evidence on the psychometric qualities of the PRO measures, and guidelines for interpreting PRO findings will facilitate achieving a PRO labeling or promotional claim. Combining all the relevant information into a single document will facilitate the review and evaluation process for clinical and regulatory reviewers. The PRO Evidence Dossier may also be helpful to industry and academic researchers in identifying further information that will need to be developed to support the clinical development program and the PRO endpoints.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensusPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Other Patient-Reported Outcomes in the European Centralized Drug Regulatory Process: A Review of Guidance Documents and Performed Authorizations of Medicinal Products 1995 to 2003Value in Health, 2005
- Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labelsControlled Clinical Trials, 2004
- Beyond the Development of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL) Measures: A Checklist for Evaluating HRQOL Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials—Does HRQOL Evaluation in Prostate Cancer Research Inform Clinical Decision Making?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Incorporating the Patient's Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001Value in Health, 2003
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Measurement of Health Outcomes in Treatment Effectiveness EvaluationsMedical Care, 2000
- Recommendations for Evaluating the Validity of Quality of Life Claims for Labeling and PromotionValue in Health, 1999
- Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of LifeJAMA, 1995
- A Self-complete Measure of Health Status for Chronic Airflow Limitation: The St. George's Respiratory QuestionnaireAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1992