The Immunosuppressive Aspects of Blood Transfusion
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 7 (4) , 176-188
- https://doi.org/10.1177/088506669200700405
Abstract
Blood transfusion is associated with immunosuppression, although the exact etiology of the immunosuppressive effect is not fully understood. The clinical significance of the immunosuppressive effect of blood transfusion has been examined in three situations: (1) studies of renal allograft survival after renal transplantation, (2) outcome studies in patients who have had surgical resection of solid cancer tumors, and (3) studies of infection rates in postoperative patients. In each scenario, the data support the conclusion that transfusion is associated with immunosuppression as manifested by increased renal allograft survival, increased recurrence and mortality rates in patients with cancer, and increased infection rates in postoperative patients who are transfused. Not all studies demonstrate an immunosuppressive effect of transfusion. There are several possible explanations for these discrepancies. First, prognostic variables other than transfusion itself account for the outcome results in these retrospective studies. Second, the extent of immunosuppression may be influenced by the type of blood product transfused, the amount transfused, and the timing of the transfusion; these factors have not been considered in all studies. For example, whole blood has been implicated as having a greater immunosuppressive effect than packed red blood cells, and many studies have shown that more than three units of packed red blood cells are necessary to affect outcome. Controlled animal studies have tested the hypothesis that transfusions increase solid tumor growth or the risk for infection. These studies have yielded conflicting results. Nevertheless, evidence that blood transfusion influences clinical outcome mitigates that a decision to transfuse must consider both risks and benefits of a transfusion; the possible consequences of immunosuppression must be included among the risks. Use of autologous blood, erythropoietin, and, in the future, synthetic hemoglobin may lead to improved outcome in patients with certain disease processes.Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perioperative Blood Transfusions are Associated with Decreased Time to Recurrence and Decreased Survival after Resection of Colorectal Liver MetastasesAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- Effect of Antiidiotypic Antibodies to HLA on Graft Survival in Renal-Allograft RecipientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Effect of pre-operative blood transfusion on tumour metastasesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Perioperative blood transfusion and cancer prognosis. Different effects of blood transfusion on prognosis of colon and breast cancer patientsCancer, 1987
- Relation between recurrence of cancer and blood transfusion.BMJ, 1985
- BLOOD TRANSFUSION AND TUMOUR GROWTH: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDYAnz Journal of Surgery, 1985
- AIDS — An Immunologic ReevaluationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Risk of Infection after Penetrating Abdominal TraumaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Deliberate Donor-specific Blood Transfusions Prior to Living Related Renal TransplantationAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- Improvement of Kidney-Graft Survival with Increased Numbers of Blood TransfusionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978