GRAS versus minimizing absolute and squared differences: a comment
- 1 September 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Economic Systems Research
- Vol. 17 (3) , 327-331
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310500221864
Abstract
Junius and Oosterhaven (2003) developed the GRAS algorithm that minimizes the information gain when updating input-output tables with both positive and negative signs. Jackson and Murray (2004), however, claim that minimizing squared differences in coefficients produces a smaller information gain, which is theoretically impossible. In this comment, calculation errors are sorted out from differences in measures, and it is shown that the information gain needs to be taken in absolute terms when increasing and decreasing cell values occur together. The numerical results show that GRAS outperforms both sign-preserving alternatives in all but one comparison of lesser economic importance. Moreover, as opposed to the result of Jackson and Murray, they show that minimizing absolute differences consistently outperforms minimizing squared differences, which overweighs large errors in small coefficients.RAS, biproportional updating, input-output, information gain,Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative Input-Output Matrix Updating FormulationsEconomic Systems Research, 2004
- Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural AnalysisEconomic Systems Research, 2004
- The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with both Positive and Negative EntriesEconomic Systems Research, 2003
- An Economic Analysis of Biproportional Properties in an Input‐Output SystemJournal of Regional Science, 2002