A comparative analysis of geometric and image-based volumetric and intensity data registration algorithms

25 June 2003

conference paper
Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Vol. 3, 2506-2511 vol.3
https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2002.1013608

Abstract

We present and contrast four methods for registering 3D range data to 2D images. Two are calibration techniques that recover the rigid transformation between the sensor poses, based on point or line correspondences. The two others recover a direct, image based mapping between the data sets. The accuracy of each method is experimentally evaluated on test patterns and objects. We found that the point based calibration method is the best approach to recover a global registration between the two sensors, while an image-based method performed best when registering local regions.

Keywords

This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:

Cylindrical panoramic image-based model for robot localization
Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
3D–2D Projective Registration of Free-Form Curves and Surfaces
Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 1997
Video mosaics for virtual environments
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1996
Structure and motion from line segments in multiple images
Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,1995
Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: a factorization method
International Journal of Computer Vision, 1992
Pose estimation from corresponding point data
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1989
A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses
IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 1987